Fruits of the contract: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Not what you think it is. Her Majesty’s judiciary, who in times past may have had a ''double entendre'' bypass, were thinking only of the benefit one expects to accrue...") |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 20:34, 22 April 2017
Not what you think it is.
Her Majesty’s judiciary, who in times past may have had a double entendre bypass, were thinking only of the benefit one expects to accrue from the faithful performance by your counterparty of his legally binding promises to you.