Risk Magazine: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
{{seealso}} | {{seealso}} | ||
*[[Awards]] | *[[Awards]] | ||
*It’s [[Lehman]] you’re looking for, not ''[[Lehmans]]'' (unless you are after spokes for your wagon-wheel). | *It’s [[Lehman]] you’re looking for, not ''[[Lehmans]]'' (unless you are after spokes for your wagon-wheel). Except it isn't even [[Lehman]] you’re looking for any more it’s (for the time being) [[Barclays Investment Bank]] and [[Nomura]]. {{eheu}}. | ||
{{draft}} | {{draft}} | ||
{{egg}} | {{egg}} | ||
Revision as of 13:59, 6 July 2017
In the context of derivatives, and the award of meaningless baubles to insecure men, Risk Magazine is your pony of choice.
Risk Magazine, on the other hand, is a different kind of magazine altogether, although its reader-appeal is a bit more obvious.
See also
- Awards
- It’s Lehman you’re looking for, not Lehmans (unless you are after spokes for your wagon-wheel). Except it isn't even Lehman you’re looking for any more it’s (for the time being) Barclays Investment Bank and Nomura. Template:Eheu.