Terry’s law: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
A vital part of pragmatic jurisprudence, neatly captured by the {{tag|Latin}} maxim.
A vital part of pragmatic jurisprudence, neatly captured by the {{tag|Latin}} maxim.


''[[quod occulo non videt coquus non est culpandum]]''
''[[quod oculo non videt coquus non est culpandum]]''


Comes in two flavours:
Comes in two flavours:

Revision as of 11:14, 7 August 2017

A vital part of pragmatic jurisprudence, neatly captured by the Latin maxim.

quod oculo non videt coquus non est culpandum

Comes in two flavours:

  • covenants by which you expect counterparties to promptly advise you of their breach of contract to you
  • Covenants the breach of which you cannot realistically expect to ever find out about.