Legal technology: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{itstrategy}} ===Addressing the barnacle risk=== '''Strategic over tactical''': When drafting and updating templates *always* prioritise strategic over tactical. Say...") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
**take out specifics and render them as general statements | **take out specifics and render them as general statements | ||
**remove optionality and complexity – this is a tech and management imperative. | **remove optionality and complexity – this is a tech and management imperative. | ||
{{C|Technology}} | |||
Revision as of 11:31, 17 October 2017
See: IT strategy
Addressing the barnacle risk
Strategic over tactical: When drafting and updating templates *always* prioritise strategic over tactical. Say a new regulation has been introduced (I mean, just imagine!) which poses the question whether an existing form should be updated:
- really, does it? Challenge whether any change is necessary
- on economic grounds (could we lose money? How much? Realistically, how likely?)
- on regulatory grounds (could we be in breach of the law? What are the consequences?)
- on reputational grounds (could this affect the firm's franchise? How?)
- If the issue is important look to do so in a way that shortens and simplifies:
- take out specifics and render them as general statements
- remove optionality and complexity – this is a tech and management imperative.