RBS Rights Issue Litigation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{Seealso}} | {{Seealso}} | ||
*{{casenote|SFO|ENRC}} | *{{casenote|SFO|ENRC}} | ||
*{{ | *{{casenote1|Three Rivers No. 5}} | ||
*[[privilege]] | *[[privilege]] | ||
Revision as of 10:17, 22 January 2018
High Court has applied the much-criticised Court of Appeal decision in Three Rivers No 5 to find that interviews conducted by a bank's solicitors with its employees were not covered by legal advice privilege, as the employees in question did not form part of the "client" for privilege purposes