Equity of redemption: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Dutch door mat.jpg|thumb|A | [[File:Dutch door mat.jpg|thumb|A dutch door mat, or “terugkoopvermogen” yesterday]] | ||
[[File:Clogs.jpg|thumb|Some clogs yesterday]] | [[File:Clogs.jpg|thumb|Some clogs yesterday]] | ||
The [[equity of redemption]] is a concept developed by the courts of chancery from an old Dutch metaphor. In the 19th century, a “''terugkoopvermogen''” was a multi-purpose brush mat. By tradition, a Dutch tulip farmer (or miller) expecting guests would lay one at the front door as a place for visitors to put their footwear when visiting. | |||
As long as there were visitors, the ''terugkoopvermogen'' could not be otherwise used. | |||
Once all the visitors had left, taking their [[clogs]] with them, the farmer was able to take the mat back and put it to a better use. | |||
By metaphor this was extended to the residual value of an asset to its pledgor once all liabilities against which it was pledged had been satisfied<ref>Work with me here, okay? It is NOT EASY making light of this stuff.</ref>. | |||
Hence the expression “Eey oop, my lover, put your [[Clog on the equity of redemption|clogs]] on the [[equity of redemption]] pet” and “Whooargh, he can put his [[Clog on the equity of redemption|clogs]] on my equity of redemption at ''any time''.” | Hence the expression “Eey oop, my lover, put your [[Clog on the equity of redemption|clogs]] on the [[equity of redemption]] pet” and “Whooargh, he can put his [[Clog on the equity of redemption|clogs]] on my equity of redemption at ''any time''.” |
Revision as of 17:18, 9 March 2018
The equity of redemption is a concept developed by the courts of chancery from an old Dutch metaphor. In the 19th century, a “terugkoopvermogen” was a multi-purpose brush mat. By tradition, a Dutch tulip farmer (or miller) expecting guests would lay one at the front door as a place for visitors to put their footwear when visiting.
As long as there were visitors, the terugkoopvermogen could not be otherwise used.
Once all the visitors had left, taking their clogs with them, the farmer was able to take the mat back and put it to a better use.
By metaphor this was extended to the residual value of an asset to its pledgor once all liabilities against which it was pledged had been satisfied[1].
Hence the expression “Eey oop, my lover, put your clogs on the equity of redemption pet” and “Whooargh, he can put his clogs on my equity of redemption at any time.”
This is possibly the worst joke on this whole wiki, and that's saying something.
References
- ↑ Work with me here, okay? It is NOT EASY making light of this stuff.