No-fault termination: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Conclusion of one’s contractual arrangements without any hotheadness, jabbing fingers or hurt feelings. Terminating a contract by delivering notice, and announcing, apropos...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Conclusion of one’s contractual arrangements without any hotheadness, jabbing fingers or hurt feelings. Terminating a contract by delivering notice, and announcing, apropos nothing in particular, that it’s time to move on.
Conclusion of one’s {{tag|contract}}ual arrangements without any hot-headedness, jabbing fingers or hurt feelings. Terminating a contract by delivering notice, and announcing, apropos nothing in particular, that it’s time to move on.


to be contrasted with [[event of default|termination with extreme prejudice]].
To be contrasted with [[event of default|termination with extreme prejudice]].
 
Fun fact: There is ''no'' means to terminate an {{isdama}} on notice. Either you go [[Full Metal Jacket]], or [[Hotel California]].


{{seealso}}
{{seealso}}
*[[Events of default]]
*[[Events of default]]
*[[Early termination event]]s
*[[Termination event]]s
*[[Close out]]

Revision as of 14:11, 13 November 2018

Conclusion of one’s contractual arrangements without any hot-headedness, jabbing fingers or hurt feelings. Terminating a contract by delivering notice, and announcing, apropos nothing in particular, that it’s time to move on.

To be contrasted with termination with extreme prejudice.

Fun fact: There is no means to terminate an ISDA Master Agreement on notice. Either you go Full Metal Jacket, or Hotel California.

See also