President of India v Lips Maritime Corporation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "The House revisited the topic in {{Cite|President of India|Lips Maritime Corporation|1988|AC|395}}, where a claim for a currency exchange loss through late payment of de...") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) |
(No difference)
| |
Revision as of 15:55, 9 January 2019
The House revisited the topic in President of India v Lips Maritime Corporation [1988] AC 395, where a claim for a currency exchange loss through late payment of demurrage failed on the straightforward basis that demurrage is liquidated damages, and the law knows no such thing as a claim for damages for failing to pay damages.
Claims to recover currency exchange losses as damages for breach of contract, whether the breach relied on is late payment of a debt or any other breach, are subject to the same rules as apply to claims for damages for breach of contract" (ie ordinary remoteness of damage and causation principles)