EBayer’s dilemma: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
VisualWikitext
Redirected page to Prisoner’s dilemma
 
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
#redirect[[Prisoner’s dilemma]]
{{a|risk|}}
For those spooked by the idea of the [[prisoner’s dilemma]] — being locked up in a police cell on trumped-up charges, consider instead the [[eBayer’s dilemma]]. This version {{author|Douglas Hofstadter}} once described as the "briefcase came", but Millennials will recognise it as the [[eBayer’s dilemma]].
 
Strangers consider a settling a transaction they have drunkenly agreed on eBay to purchase a set of complete boxed set of the final season of ''Some Mothers Do ’Ave ’Em'' on VHS, for £100<ref>The eBayers don’t ''have'' to be drunk, but as we all know, most people on eBay ''are'', so this is a bit of dramatic colour.</ref>.
 
The seller must pay for, and the buyer must post the videos, simultaneously. Assume the seller would have sold the videos at any price over £50 (so the transaction represents a £50 profit for {{sex|her}}), and the buyer would have paid up to £150 had that been the asking price (the transaction therefore representing a £50 profit for him). In other words, by honouring the transaction, each stands to gain £50.
 
{{eBayer’s dilemma}}When settling the transaction, each has the following risks:
*'''Cooperation''': If the seller posts ''and'' the buyer pays:
**The seller will get £100 but will lose a video it values a £50 (+£50).
**the seller will get a video it values at £150 but must pay £100 (+50)
*'''buyer defects''': If the seller posts, but the buyer does not pay:
**The buyer will have video it values at £150 for free (+£150)
**The seller has given away a video it values a £50 for nothing (-£50).
*'''Seller defects''': If the buyer pays but the seller does not post:
**The buyer will have paid £100 for nothing (-£100)
**The seller will receive £100 for nothing (+£100).
*'''Mutual defection''' If the seller does not post ''and'' the buyer does not pay:
**The seller is in its original position (£0).
**The buyer is in its original position (£0).
 
{{sa}}
*[[Prisoner’s dilemma]]
*[[Agency problem]]
{{ref}}

Latest revision as of 14:19, 28 August 2019

Risk Anatomy™
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.


For those spooked by the idea of the prisoner’s dilemma — being locked up in a police cell on trumped-up charges, consider instead the eBayer’s dilemma. This version Douglas Hofstadter once described as the "briefcase came", but Millennials will recognise it as the eBayer’s dilemma.

Strangers consider a settling a transaction they have drunkenly agreed on eBay to purchase a set of complete boxed set of the final season of Some Mothers Do ’Ave ’Em on VHS, for £100[1].

The seller must pay for, and the buyer must post the videos, simultaneously. Assume the seller would have sold the videos at any price over £50 (so the transaction represents a £50 profit for her), and the buyer would have paid up to £150 had that been the asking price (the transaction therefore representing a £50 profit for him). In other words, by honouring the transaction, each stands to gain £50.

eBayer’s dilemma
payoff table'

Buyer cooperates

Buyer defects

Seller cooperates

Buyer gets £50
Seller gets £50

Buyer gets £150
Seller gets -£50

Seller defects

Buyer gets -£100
Seller gets £150

Buyer gets £0
Seller gets £0

When settling the transaction, each has the following risks:

  • Cooperation: If the seller posts and the buyer pays:
    • The seller will get £100 but will lose a video it values a £50 (+£50).
    • the seller will get a video it values at £150 but must pay £100 (+50)
  • buyer defects: If the seller posts, but the buyer does not pay:
    • The buyer will have video it values at £150 for free (+£150)
    • The seller has given away a video it values a £50 for nothing (-£50).
  • Seller defects: If the buyer pays but the seller does not post:
    • The buyer will have paid £100 for nothing (-£100)
    • The seller will receive £100 for nothing (+£100).
  • Mutual defection If the seller does not post and the buyer does not pay:
    • The seller is in its original position (£0).
    • The buyer is in its original position (£0).

See also

References

  1. ↑ The eBayers don’t have to be drunk, but as we all know, most people on eBay are, so this is a bit of dramatic colour.
Retrieved from "https://jollycontrarian.com/index.php?title=EBayer’s_dilemma&oldid=32585"