Non-Commencement or Discontinuance of the Exchange-traded Contract - Equity Derivatives Provision: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{eqderivanat|6.8(e)}}
{{eqderivanat|6.8(e)}}
Part of the greater flow of what you should do if you have a {{eqderivprov|Index}} swap which you are hedging by reference to an {{eqderivprov|Exchange-traded Contract}}. This part: what to do if the {{eqderivprov|Exchange-traded Contract}} you are hedging with goes away, or — more [[Ontological uncertainty|ontologically]] challengingly, you would think — ''never existed in the first place''.
Part of the greater flow of what you should do if you have a {{eqderivprov|Index}} swap which you are hedging by reference to an {{eqderivprov|Exchange-traded Contract}}. This part: what to do if the {{eqderivprov|Exchange-traded Contract}} you are hedging with goes away, or — more [[Ontological uncertainty|ontologically]] challengingly, you would think — ''never existed in the first place''.
{{sa}}
*{{eqderivprov|Futures Price Valuation}}, being the wider provision of which this is a part.

Revision as of 12:23, 26 September 2019

Template:Eqderivanat Part of the greater flow of what you should do if you have a Index swap which you are hedging by reference to an Exchange-traded Contract. This part: what to do if the Exchange-traded Contract you are hedging with goes away, or — more ontologically challengingly, you would think — never existed in the first place.

See also