Manifest error: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


In {{casenote|North Shore Ventures Ltd|Anstead Holdings Inc}} the court said:
In {{casenote|North Shore Ventures Ltd|Anstead Holdings Inc}} the court said:
:“it is quite possible for one person to certify the existence of some fact at a particular moment in time which the other person, the recipient of the certificate, cannot verify save after the occurrence of a subsequent event”.
:“it is quite possible for one person to certify the existence of some fact at a particular moment in time which the other person, the recipient of the certificate, cannot verify [[save]] after the occurrence of a subsequent event”.


{{seealso}}
{{seealso}}

Revision as of 13:40, 8 November 2019

The Jolly Contrarian’s Glossary
The snippy guide to financial services lingo.™
Index — Click the ᐅ to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

manifest error” was in IIG Capital llc v Van der Merwe[1] as one which is “obvious or easily demonstrable without extensive investigation” even if not readily apparent at the time that the certificate was provided.

In North Shore Ventures Ltd v Anstead Holdings Inc the court said:

“it is quite possible for one person to certify the existence of some fact at a particular moment in time which the other person, the recipient of the certificate, cannot verify save after the occurrence of a subsequent event”.

See also

References

  1. [2007] EWHC 435 para 52