Template:CSA specification of matters: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
On the one hand, you can see where they’re coming from — this is the same [[common law]] which concluded<ref>{{casenote|Greenclose|National Westminster Bank plc}}.</ref> [[email]] is not an [[electronic messaging system]], after all - but on the other hand ''come on''. <br> | On the one hand, you can see where they’re coming from — this is the same [[common law]] which concluded<ref>{{casenote|Greenclose|National Westminster Bank plc}}.</ref> [[email]] is not an [[electronic messaging system]], after all - but on the other hand ''come on''. <br> | ||
Thanks for phoning it in, team. | |||
Latest revision as of 14:38, 17 January 2020
One from the “well, I’ll be blowed” school of legal expression wherein ISDA’s crack drafting squad™ states the bleeding obvious for the benefit of those timid types who — despite being schooled in its weft and warp — don’t quite trust the common law to deliver elementary common sense.
On the one hand, you can see where they’re coming from — this is the same common law which concluded[1] email is not an electronic messaging system, after all - but on the other hand come on.
Thanks for phoning it in, team.