Fearns v Anglo-Dutch Paint and Chemical Company Ltd: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
What to do? | What to do? | ||
{{ | {{sa}} | ||
*[http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2010/2366.html Judgment transcript from Fearns v Anglo-Dutch] | *[http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2010/2366.html Judgment transcript from Fearns v Anglo-Dutch] | ||
*[[Set-off]] | *[[Set-off]] | ||
{{ref}} | {{ref}} |
Revision as of 11:02, 19 January 2020
Regulatory Capital Anatomy™
The JC’s untutored thoughts on how bank capital works.
|
Fearns and Anglo-Dutch sued each other. They both won. Fearns was awarded £438,569 for breach of trademark. Anglo Dutch was awarded €594,696 for goods sold to Mr Fearns which he didn't pay for.
Keen observers will note these amounts are in different currencies; one in the heroic currency of the United Kingdom, one in that ghastly monopoly money of those garlic-munching continentals.[1]
What to do?
See also
References
- ↑ We can say things like this now we have a Red white and blue Brexit, right?