Template:M comp disc GMRA 2000 6(j): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Oddly — actually, come to think of it, ''not'' oddly, but ''sensibly'' — the otherwise quite comparable {{gmsla}} doesn't have a flawed asset provision (the closest it...") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Oddly — actually, come to think of it, ''not'' oddly, but ''sensibly'' — the otherwise quite comparable {{gmsla}} | Oddly — actually, come to think of it, ''not'' oddly, but ''sensibly'' — the otherwise quite comparable {{gmsla}} doesn’t have a [[flawed asset]] provision (the closest it gets is Paragraph {{gmslaprov|8.6}}), even though in most every other respect, it’s very similar to the {{gmra}}. | ||
Revision as of 19:15, 23 February 2020
Oddly — actually, come to think of it, not oddly, but sensibly — the otherwise quite comparable 2010 GMSLA doesn’t have a flawed asset provision (the closest it gets is Paragraph 8.6), even though in most every other respect, it’s very similar to the Global Master Repurchase Agreement.