Template:M comp disc GMRA 2000 6(j): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Oddly — actually, come to think of it, ''not'' oddly, but ''sensibly'' — the otherwise quite comparable {{gmsla}} doesn't have a flawed asset provision (the closest it...") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Oddly — actually, come to think of it, ''not'' oddly, but ''sensibly'' — the otherwise quite comparable {{gmsla}} | Oddly — actually, come to think of it, ''not'' oddly, but ''sensibly'' — the otherwise quite comparable {{gmsla}} doesn’t have a [[flawed asset]] provision like the {{gmra}}’s Clause {{gmraprov|6(j)}} (the closest it gets is Paragraph {{gmslaprov|8.6}}), even though in most every other respect, it’s very similar to the {{gmra}}. | ||
Latest revision as of 19:19, 23 February 2020
Oddly — actually, come to think of it, not oddly, but sensibly — the otherwise quite comparable 2010 GMSLA doesn’t have a flawed asset provision like the Global Master Repurchase Agreement’s Clause 6(j) (the closest it gets is Paragraph 8.6), even though in most every other respect, it’s very similar to the Global Master Repurchase Agreement.