Template:M comp disc GMRA 2000 6(j): Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Oddly — actually, come to think of it, ''not'' oddly, but ''sensibly'' — the otherwise quite comparable {{gmsla}} doesn’t have a [[flawed asset]] provision (the closest it gets is Paragraph {{gmslaprov|8.6}}), even though in most every other respect, it’s very similar to the {{gmra}}.
Oddly — actually, come to think of it, ''not'' oddly, but ''sensibly'' — the otherwise quite comparable {{gmsla}} doesn’t have a [[flawed asset]] provision like the {{gmra}}’s Clause {{gmraprov|6(j)}} (the closest it gets is Paragraph {{gmslaprov|8.6}}), even though in most every other respect, it’s very similar to the {{gmra}}.

Latest revision as of 19:19, 23 February 2020

Oddly — actually, come to think of it, not oddly, but sensibly — the otherwise quite comparable 2010 GMSLA doesn’t have a flawed asset provision like the Global Master Repurchase Agreement’s Clause 6(j) (the closest it gets is Paragraph 8.6), even though in most every other respect, it’s very similar to the Global Master Repurchase Agreement.