Fearns v Anglo-Dutch Paint and Chemical Company Ltd: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{cn}}Fearns and Anglo-Dutch sued each other. They both won. Fearns was awarded £438,569 for breach of trademark. Anglo Dutch was awarded €594,696 for goods sold to Mr Fearns which he didn't pay for. | ||
Keen observers will note these amounts are in different currencies; one in the heroic currency of the {{tag|United Kingdom}}, one in that ghastly monopoly money of those [[European Union|garlic-munching continentals]].<ref>We can say things like this now we have a [[Red white and blue Brexit]], right?</ref> | Keen observers will note these amounts are in different currencies; one in the heroic currency of the {{tag|United Kingdom}}, one in that ghastly monopoly money of those [[European Union|garlic-munching continentals]].<ref>We can say things like this now we have a [[Red white and blue Brexit]], right?</ref> |
Revision as of 18:39, 26 March 2020
The Jolly Contrarian Law Reports
Our own, snippy, in-house court reporting service.
|
Fearns and Anglo-Dutch sued each other. They both won. Fearns was awarded £438,569 for breach of trademark. Anglo Dutch was awarded €594,696 for goods sold to Mr Fearns which he didn't pay for.
Keen observers will note these amounts are in different currencies; one in the heroic currency of the United Kingdom, one in that ghastly monopoly money of those garlic-munching continentals.[1]
What to do?
See also
References
- ↑ We can say things like this now we have a Red white and blue Brexit, right?