Template:M summ Equity Derivatives 12.1(a): Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Break these Extraordinary Events into four categories: *'''Corporate action thingies''': (generally) benign but unscheduled matters of corporate structure concerning the m...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Break these Extraordinary Events into four categories:
{{extraordinary events capsule}}Break these '''“{{eqderivprov|Extraordinary Events}}”''' into four categories:
*'''[[Corporate action]] thingies''': (generally) benign but unscheduled matters of corporate structure concerning the management of specific underlying {{eqderivprov|Shares}}, that change the economic proposition represented by those {{eqderivprov|Shares}}, and not the [[equity derivative]] contract. So: {{eqderivprov|Merger}}s, {{eqderivprov|Tender Offer}}s;
*'''[[Corporate action]] thingies''': (generally) benign but unscheduled matters of corporate structure concerning the management of specific underlying {{eqderivprov|Shares}}, that change the economic proposition represented by those {{eqderivprov|Shares}}, and not the [[equity derivative]] contract. So: {{eqderivprov|Merger}}s, {{eqderivprov|Tender Offer}}s;
*'''[[Index Adjustment Event - Equity Derivatives Provision|Index adjustments]]''': Equivalent measures that relate to an underlying {{eqderivprov|Index}} - collectively {{eqderivprov|Index Adjustment Events}}. So:
*'''[[Index Adjustment Event - Equity Derivatives Provision|Index adjustments]]''': Equivalent measures that relate to an underlying {{eqderivprov|Index}} - collectively {{eqderivprov|Index Adjustment Events}}. So:
Line 6: Line 6:
:*'''{{eqderivprov|Index Disruption}}''': disruption in the calculation and publication of {{eqderivprov|Index}} values;
:*'''{{eqderivprov|Index Disruption}}''': disruption in the calculation and publication of {{eqderivprov|Index}} values;
*'''Negative ''external'' events relating to underlying {{eqderivprov|Issuer}}s''': {{eqderivprov|Nationalization}}s, {{eqderivprov|Insolvency}}, {{eqderivprov|Delisting}} of underlying {{eqderivprov|Issuer}}s;
*'''Negative ''external'' events relating to underlying {{eqderivprov|Issuer}}s''': {{eqderivprov|Nationalization}}s, {{eqderivprov|Insolvency}}, {{eqderivprov|Delisting}} of underlying {{eqderivprov|Issuer}}s;
*'''Matters impeding the parties in performing and hedging the Transaction''': These oftebn do have some crossover with the events above, but the emphasis here is (for the most part) on their direct impact on the parties’ respective abilities to perform and risk manage the Transaction. So, the Triple Cocktail of Chain in Law, Hedging Disruption and Increased Cost of Hedging; the specific issues relating to short-selling (Loss of Stock Borrow and Increased Cost of Stock Borrow) and then two random ones that don’t brilliantly fit with this theory, but which people tend to disapply — possibly for this exact reason, but possibly because they are largely covered by the Triple Cocktail anyway — namely {{eqderivprov|Failure to Deliver}} and, even more weirdly, {{eqderivprov|Insolvency Filing}}. <br>

Revision as of 14:12, 27 March 2020

Break these “Extraordinary Events” into four categories:

Corporate events on Issuers: Corporate Events are generally benign[1] but not always expected or even wanted adjustments to the corporate structure and management of specific underlying SharesTender Offers, Mergers, management buyouts and events that change the economic proposition represented by those Shares, and not the equity derivative contract. So: Merger Events and Tender Offers;

Index adjustments: For Index trades, unexpected adjustments and changes to methodologies and publishing strategies of underlying Index (as opposed to changes in the composition of the Index according to its pre-existing rules) — collectively call these “Index Adjustment Events”. So:

Index Modification: Changes in the calculation methodology for the Index
Index Cancellation: Where Indexes are discontinued with replacement;
Index Disruption: disruption in the calculation and publication of Index values;

Negative events affecting Issuers: Nationalizations, Insolvency, Delisting of underlying Issuers;

Additional Disruption Events: Events which directly impair performance and risk management of the Transaction itself. These often cross over with market- and Issuer-dependent events above, but the emphasis here is their direct impact on the parties’ abilities to perform and hedge the derivative Transaction itself. So:

The Triple Cocktail: The Triple Cocktail of Change in Law, Hedging Disruption and Increased Cost of Hedging;
Stock borrow events: Specific issues relating to short-selling (Loss of Stock Borrow and Increased Cost of Stock Borrow); and
Random ones that aren’t needed or used: Two random ones that don’t brilliantly fit with this theory, and which people tend to disapply — possibly for that exact reason, but they are fairly well covered by the Triple Cocktail anyway — Failure to Deliver under the Transaction on account of illiquidity and, even more randomly, Insolvency Filing[2].
Break these Extraordinary Events into four categories:
  • Negative external events relating to underlying Issuers: Nationalizations, Insolvency, Delisting of underlying Issuers;
  • Matters impeding the parties in performing and hedging the Transaction: These oftebn do have some crossover with the events above, but the emphasis here is (for the most part) on their direct impact on the parties’ respective abilities to perform and risk manage the Transaction. So, the Triple Cocktail of Chain in Law, Hedging Disruption and Increased Cost of Hedging; the specific issues relating to short-selling (Loss of Stock Borrow and Increased Cost of Stock Borrow) and then two random ones that don’t brilliantly fit with this theory, but which people tend to disapply — possibly for this exact reason, but possibly because they are largely covered by the Triple Cocktail anyway — namely Failure to Deliver and, even more weirdly, Insolvency Filing.
  1. “Benign” from the point of view of the target company’s solvency and market prospects; not quite so benign from its management team’s prospects of ongoing employment.
  2. especially since there is already an “Insolvency” event covering most of this).