Template:Extraordinary events capsule: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
:*''{{eqderivprov|Index Disruption}}'': disruption in the calculation and publication of {{eqderivprov|Index}} values;
:*''{{eqderivprov|Index Disruption}}'': disruption in the calculation and publication of {{eqderivprov|Index}} values;
*'''Negative events affecting {{eqderivprov|Issuer}}s''': {{eqderivprov|Nationalization}}s, {{eqderivprov|Insolvency}}, {{eqderivprov|Delisting}} of underlying {{eqderivprov|Issuer}}s;
*'''Negative events affecting {{eqderivprov|Issuer}}s''': {{eqderivprov|Nationalization}}s, {{eqderivprov|Insolvency}}, {{eqderivprov|Delisting}} of underlying {{eqderivprov|Issuer}}s;
*'''{{eqderivprov|Transaction}} disruption''': These often do have some crossover with market events above, but the emphasis here is the direct impact on the parties’ abilities to perform and hedge the {{eqderivprov|Transaction}}. So, the {{eqderivprov|Triple Cocktail}} of {{eqderivprov|Change in Law}}, {{eqderivprov|Hedging Disruption}} and {{eqderivprov|Increased Cost of Hedging}}; the specific issues relating to short-selling ({{eqderivprov|Loss of Stock Borrow}} and {{eqderivprov|Increased Cost of Stock Borrow}}) and then two random ones that don’t brilliantly fit with this theory, and which people tend to disapply — possibly for that exact reason, but they are fairly well covered by the {{eqderivprov|Triple Cocktail}} anyway — {{eqderivprov|Failure to Deliver}} on account of illiquidity and, even more randomly, {{eqderivprov|Insolvency Filing}}<ref>especiaklly since there is already an {{eqderivprov|Insolvency}} event covering most of this). <br>
*'''{{eqderivprov|Transaction}} disruption''': These “{{eqderivprov|Additional Disruption Events}}” often crossover with market- and {{eqderivprov|Issuer}}-dependent events above, but the emphasis here is the direct impact on the parties’ abilities to perform and [[hedge]] the derivative {{eqderivprov|Transaction}} itself. So:
:*''The {{eqderivprov|Triple Cocktail}}'': The {{eqderivprov|Triple Cocktail}} of {{eqderivprov|Change in Law}}, {{eqderivprov|Hedging Disruption}} and {{eqderivprov|Increased Cost of Hedging}};
:*''Stock borrow events'': Specific issues relating to short-selling ({{eqderivprov|Loss of Stock Borrow}} and {{eqderivprov|Increased Cost of Stock Borrow}}); and  
*''Random ones that aren’t needed or used'': Two random ones that don’t brilliantly fit with this theory, and which people tend to disapply — possibly for that exact reason, but they are fairly well covered by the {{eqderivprov|Triple Cocktail}} anyway — {{eqderivprov|Failure to Deliver}} under the {{eqderivprov|Transaction}} on account of illiquidity and, even more randomly, {{eqderivprov|Insolvency Filing}}<ref>especially since there is already an {{eqderivprov|Insolvency}}event covering most of this). <br>

Revision as of 14:35, 27 March 2020

Break these “Extraordinary Events” into four categories:

  • Random ones that aren’t needed or used: Two random ones that don’t brilliantly fit with this theory, and which people tend to disapply — possibly for that exact reason, but they are fairly well covered by the Triple Cocktail anyway — Failure to Deliver under the Transaction on account of illiquidity and, even more randomly, Insolvency Filing<ref>especially since there is already an “Insolvency” event covering most of this).