Template:Extraordinary events capsule: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
:*''The {{eqderivprov|Triple Cocktail}}'': The {{eqderivprov|Triple Cocktail}} of {{eqderivprov|Change in Law}}, {{eqderivprov|Hedging Disruption}} and {{eqderivprov|Increased Cost of Hedging}};
:*''The {{eqderivprov|Triple Cocktail}}'': The {{eqderivprov|Triple Cocktail}} of {{eqderivprov|Change in Law}}, {{eqderivprov|Hedging Disruption}} and {{eqderivprov|Increased Cost of Hedging}};
:*''Stock borrow events'': Specific issues relating to short-selling ({{eqderivprov|Loss of Stock Borrow}} and {{eqderivprov|Increased Cost of Stock Borrow}}); and  
:*''Stock borrow events'': Specific issues relating to short-selling ({{eqderivprov|Loss of Stock Borrow}} and {{eqderivprov|Increased Cost of Stock Borrow}}); and  
*''Random ones that aren’t needed or used'': Two random ones that don’t brilliantly fit with this theory, and which people tend to disapply — possibly for that exact reason, but they are fairly well covered by the {{eqderivprov|Triple Cocktail}} anyway — {{eqderivprov|Failure to Deliver}} under the {{eqderivprov|Transaction}} on account of illiquidity and, even more randomly, {{eqderivprov|Insolvency Filing}}<ref>especially since there is already an “{{eqderivprov|Insolvency}}” event covering most of this). <br>
*''Random ones that aren’t needed or used'': Two random ones that don’t brilliantly fit with this theory, and which people tend to disapply — possibly for that exact reason, but they are fairly well covered by the {{eqderivprov|Triple Cocktail}} anyway — {{eqderivprov|Failure to Deliver}} under the {{eqderivprov|Transaction}} on account of illiquidity and, even more randomly, {{eqderivprov|Insolvency Filing}}<ref>especially since there is already an “{{eqderivprov|Insolvency}}” event covering most of this).</ref>. <br>

Revision as of 14:35, 27 March 2020

Break these “Extraordinary Events” into four categories:

  • Random ones that aren’t needed or used: Two random ones that don’t brilliantly fit with this theory, and which people tend to disapply — possibly for that exact reason, but they are fairly well covered by the Triple Cocktail anyway — Failure to Deliver under the Transaction on account of illiquidity and, even more randomly, Insolvency Filing[1].
  1. especially since there is already an “Insolvency” event covering most of this).