Template:M summ 2002 ISDA electronic messages: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "An innocuous definition you would think ''but you would be wrong''. For behold: an electronic message ''excludes'' {{isdaprov|e-mail}}. This was a persuasive factor in the lea...") |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 20:06, 18 April 2020
An innocuous definition you would think but you would be wrong. For behold: an electronic message excludes e-mail. This was a persuasive factor in the learned judge’s idiosyncratic reasoning in the great case of Greenclose v National Westminster Bank plc, a case that illustrates the point that little old ladies make bad law.