Not everybody is a game-changer, but everybody can make a game-changing impact: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{a|shitmaxim|}} Let’s put this one through the syllogistic wringer. This means one of two things, either (a) not everyone ''is'' a game changer, but everyone ''can be'' a g...") |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 15:35, 13 October 2020
Crappy advice you find on LinkedIn™
|
Let’s put this one through the syllogistic wringer. This means one of two things, either (a) not everyone is a game changer, but everyone can be a game changer even if ultimately some are not, in which case, so what? What use is someone who could be, but eventually isn’t, a game changer? And if we are being deterministic about it — something the JC is not usually minded to do except to prove a point like this one, but still —
P1 Not everybody is a game-changer, P2 Everybody can make a game-changing impact and contribution