Negative pledge: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{g}}An agreement with one lender not to pledge security in favour of another one. A rather bankery thing, much more fashionable in the olden days than now, and probably the g...")
 
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{g}}An agreement with one lender not to pledge security in favour of another one. A rather bankery thing, much more fashionable in the olden days than now, and probably the genesis of the curious {{repprov|No event of default or potential event of default}} [[representation]] we all know, love and routinely pass over when perusing our counterparty’s early draft.
{{g}}A [[negative pledge]] is an covenant a [[borrower]] makes to  one [[lender]] not to create [[Security interest|security]] over its assets in favour of another lender. A rather bankery thing — if obeyed, it preserves a fellow’s jostling space at the bar should the counterparty go to hell — but does, rather, cramp a young undertaking’s style.
 
Thus, much more fashionable in the olden days than now, and probably the genesis of the curious {{repprov|No event of default or potential event of default}} [[representation]] we all know, love and routinely pass over when perusing our counterparty’s early draft. (we can’t think of any other reason for it, that is to say).


{{sa}}
{{sa}}
*[[Representations and Warranties Anatomy]]
*[[Representations and Warranties Anatomy]]

Latest revision as of 12:39, 3 December 2020

The Jolly Contrarian’s Glossary
The snippy guide to financial services lingo.™


Index — Click the ᐅ to expand:

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

A negative pledge is an covenant a borrower makes to one lender not to create security over its assets in favour of another lender. A rather bankery thing — if obeyed, it preserves a fellow’s jostling space at the bar should the counterparty go to hell — but does, rather, cramp a young undertaking’s style.

Thus, much more fashionable in the olden days than now, and probably the genesis of the curious No event of default or potential event of default representation we all know, love and routinely pass over when perusing our counterparty’s early draft. (we can’t think of any other reason for it, that is to say).

See also