Negative pledge: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{g}}A [[negative pledge]] is an covenant a [[borrower]] makes to one [[lender]] not to create [[Security interest|security]] over its assets in favour of another lender. A rather bankery thing — if obeyed, it preserves a | {{g}}A [[negative pledge]] is an covenant a [[borrower]] makes to one [[lender]] not to create [[Security interest|security]] over its assets in favour of another lender. A rather bankery thing — if obeyed, it preserves a fellow’s jostling space at the bar should the counterparty go to hell — but does, rather, cramp a young undertaking’s style. | ||
Thus, much more fashionable in the olden days than now, and probably the genesis of the curious {{repprov|No event of default or potential event of default}} [[representation]] we all know, love and routinely pass over when perusing our counterparty’s early draft. (we can’t think of any other reason for it, that is to say). | |||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} | ||
*[[Representations and Warranties Anatomy]] | *[[Representations and Warranties Anatomy]] | ||
Latest revision as of 12:39, 3 December 2020
|
|
A negative pledge is an covenant a borrower makes to one lender not to create security over its assets in favour of another lender. A rather bankery thing — if obeyed, it preserves a fellow’s jostling space at the bar should the counterparty go to hell — but does, rather, cramp a young undertaking’s style.
Thus, much more fashionable in the olden days than now, and probably the genesis of the curious No event of default or potential event of default representation we all know, love and routinely pass over when perusing our counterparty’s early draft. (we can’t think of any other reason for it, that is to say).