Narrative: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "{{g}}The part of language that those who see great things for narrow AI miss completely. The fact that a fellow, when approaching a text, brings with him a trunk full cultural..." |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{g}}The part of language that those who see great things for narrow AI miss completely. The fact that a fellow, when approaching a text, brings with him a trunk full cultural baggage, from which he will construct the model and make the assumptions, and draw the conclusions he needs to make sense of what he has just read. | {{g}}{{quote|“The cat sat on the mat” is not a story. “The cat sat on ''the dog’s'' mat” is a story. | ||
:—{{author|John le Carré}}}} The part of language that those who see great things for narrow [[AI]] miss completely. The fact that a fellow, when approaching a text, brings with him a trunk full cultural baggage, from which he will construct the model and make the assumptions, and draw the conclusions he needs to make sense of what he has just read. That the act of interpretation is not a rational algorithm run on a string of symbols with mutually exclusive, unambiguous designations, but an imaginative act that exists in the hot space between the reader and the page. | |||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} | ||
*[[Risk taxonomy]] | *[[Risk taxonomy]] | ||
*[[AI]] | *[[AI]] | ||
Latest revision as of 22:22, 14 December 2020
|
“The cat sat on the mat” is not a story. “The cat sat on the dog’s mat” is a story.
The part of language that those who see great things for narrow AI miss completely. The fact that a fellow, when approaching a text, brings with him a trunk full cultural baggage, from which he will construct the model and make the assumptions, and draw the conclusions he needs to make sense of what he has just read. That the act of interpretation is not a rational algorithm run on a string of symbols with mutually exclusive, unambiguous designations, but an imaginative act that exists in the hot space between the reader and the page.