Epistemology: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "The branch of {{t|philosophy}} concerned with knowledge — and certainty. Lawyers are, by nature, Cartesian in their outlook,. By disposition they are inclined to...")
 
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The branch of {{t|philosophy}} concerned with knowledge — and certainty. [[Lawyers]] are, by nature, [[Cartesian]] in their outlook,. By disposition they are [[inclined]] to be supremely un-confident that things that appear to be the case are the case, so they write leadenly as a consequence.
{{a|philosophy|}}The branch of [[philosophy]] concerned with knowledge — and certainty. [[Lawyers]] are, by nature, [[Cartesian]] in their outlook. By disposition they are [[inclined]] to be supremely un-confident that things that appear to be the case are the case, so they write leadenly as a consequence.
{{seealso}}
{{sa}}
*[[René Descartes]]
*[[René Descartes]]
*[[Jurisprudence]]
*[[Metaphysics]]
*[[Metaphysics]]
*[[Onotology]] and the [[profound ontological uncertainty]] that accompanies the practice of the law.
*[[Ontology]] and the [[profound ontological uncertainty]] that accompanies the practice of the law.
{{egg}}
{{egg}}
{{draft}}
{{draft}}
{{c|Epistemology}}

Latest revision as of 09:28, 30 December 2020

Philosophy


The JC looks deep into the well. Or abyss.
Click ᐅ to expand:

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

The branch of philosophy concerned with knowledge — and certainty. Lawyers are, by nature, Cartesian in their outlook. By disposition they are inclined to be supremely un-confident that things that appear to be the case are the case, so they write leadenly as a consequence.

See also