Passive breach: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "A breach of an asset ratio of some kind (the vaunted UCITS 10% concentration limit, or the Regulation T requirement for the a prime broker’s customer to...")
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
A breach of an [[asset]] ratio of some kind (the vaunted [[UCITS]] 10% concentration limit, or the [[Regulation T]] requirement for the a [[prime broker]]’s [[customer]] to have $500,000 in [[liquid]] assets) that is breached not by active investment or divestment, but by the relative change in market value of assets in an existing portfolio.
{{a|g|}}A breach of an [[asset]] ratio of some kind (the vaunted [[UCITS]] 10% concentration limit, or the [[Regulation T]] requirement for the a [[prime broker]]’s [[customer]] to have $500,000 in [[liquid]] assets) that is breached not by active investment or divestment, but by the relative change in market value of assets in an existing portfolio.


{{sa}}
{{sa}}
*[[SEC no-action letter]] and [[Regulation T]]
*[[SEC no-action letter]] and [[Regulation T]]
*[[UCITS]]
*[[UCITS]]

Latest revision as of 10:35, 12 February 2021

The Jolly Contrarian’s Glossary
The snippy guide to financial services lingo.™


Index — Click the ᐅ to expand:

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

A breach of an asset ratio of some kind (the vaunted UCITS 10% concentration limit, or the Regulation T requirement for the a prime broker’s customer to have $500,000 in liquid assets) that is breached not by active investment or divestment, but by the relative change in market value of assets in an existing portfolio.

See also