Tort: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
You might wish to consider [[negligence]], or indeed that trifecta of mediocre drafting [[negligence, fraud or wilful misconduct]], for more information.
You might wish to consider [[negligence]], or indeed that trifecta of mediocre drafting [[negligence, fraud or wilful misconduct]], for more information.


But don’t be a [[nuisance]].<ref>{{hawf}}</ref> Unless you're playing [[coming to the nuisance is no defence|cricket]].
But don’t be a [[nuisance]].<ref>{{hawf}}</ref> Unless you’re playing [[coming to the nuisance is no defence|cricket]].


C’mon, there’s some good material here folks.
C’mon, there’s some good material here folks.
{{ref}}
{{ref}}

Revision as of 15:44, 17 June 2021

The basic principles of tort
A Jolly Contrarian guide to loving thy neighbour™
Contract quasi-contractquasi-agencytortrestitution Index: Click to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

Not a torte.
Nor, for that matter, a breach of contract.

You might wish to consider negligence, or indeed that trifecta of mediocre drafting negligence, fraud or wilful misconduct, for more information.

But don’t be a nuisance.[1] Unless you’re playing cricket.

C’mon, there’s some good material here folks.

References

  1. Here all week, folks!
    This gag comes to you direct from our “here all week, folks!” store of corking one-liners.