From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
|
| (9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{fullanat|isda|4(a)|2002}}
| | #redirect[[Agreements - ISDA Provision]] |
| ''Section 4(a) of the {{1992ma}} is materially identical''. <br>
| |
| In the {{t|ISDA}} {{isdaprov|schedule}} there's a part — {{isdaprov|Part 3}} as a matter of fact — containing table of {{isdaprov|Specified Information}}: documents that the parties agree to deliver to each other at certain times. The table in part 3 itemises what must be delivered, by whom, by when, and whether the {{isdaprov|Specified Information}} in question is covered by the Section {{isdaprov|3(d)}} representation as to accuracy and completeness. It will also totally bugger up the formatting in your document. It is a well-known fact that no [[ISDA negotiator]] on the face of the earth knows how to format a table in [[Microsoft Word]].
| |
| | |
| Then again, nor does anyone else.
| |
| | |
| ==== Not providing {{isdaprov|documents for delivery}} is an {{isdaprov|Event of Default}} ====
| |
| | |
| In any case, the significance of those documents is rendered by this provision: it is by dint of this that the parties agree to exchange them. A failure, therefore, to produce documents set out in {{isdaprov|4(a)(i)(ii)}} would amount to an {{isdaprov|Event of Default}} for {{isdaprov|Breach of Agreement}} under Section {{isdaprov|5(a)(ii)}}. Note that to get to this conclusion you need to follow a tortured chain of nested [[double negative|double negatives]] between clauses {{isdaprov|4(a)}} and {{isdaprov|5(a)(ii)}}.
| |
| {{Withholding under ISDA}}
| |
Latest revision as of 13:12, 9 January 2022