Template:Isda 3(c) comp: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Section {{isda92prov|3(c)}} was one of the bits of the {{1992ma}} that {{icds}} “got ''mostly'' right” at the first time of asking. But still, some bright sparks on [[The ’squad|the ’Squad]] took it upon themselves, in the {{2002ma}} to switch out reference to “{{{{{1}}}|Affiliate}}s” — which, I don’t know, might take in some distant half-bred cousin you don’t enormously care about and who doesn’t cast any real shadow on your [[creditworthiness]] — with {{{{{1}}}|Credit Support Provider}}s and {{{{{1}}}|Specified Entities}} who no doubt more keenly do, but this leads to just more fiddliness in the Schedule over-stuffed with fiddliness, since one must then go to the trouble of specifying, and then arguing with your counterparties about, who should count as a {{{{{1}}}|Specified Entity}} for this remote and rather vacuous purpose.
Section {{{{{1}}}|3(c)}} was one of the bits of the {{1992ma}} that {{icds}} “got ''mostly'' right” at the first time of asking. But still, some bright sparks on [[The ’squad|the ’Squad]] took it upon themselves, in the {{2002ma}}, to switch out reference to “{{{{{1}}}|Affiliate}}s” which — I don’t know, might take in some distant half-bred cousin you don’t enormously care about and who doesn’t cast any real shadow on your [[creditworthiness]] or something? — with {{{{{1}}}|Credit Support Provider}}s and {{{{{1}}}|Specified Entities}} who no doubt more keenly do, but this leads to just more fiddliness in the Schedule over-stuffed with fiddliness, since one must then go to the trouble of specifying, and then arguing with your counterparties about, who should count as a {{{{{1}}}|Specified Entity}} for this remote and rather vacuous purpose.


Keeps the home fires burning in the hobbity shires where [[ISDA negotiator]]s make their homes, we suppose.
Keeps the home fires burning in the hobbity shires where [[ISDA negotiator]]s make their homes, we suppose.

Revision as of 17:11, 2 February 2022

Section {{{{{1}}}|3(c)}} was one of the bits of the 1992 ISDA that ISDA’s crack drafting squad™ “got mostly right” at the first time of asking. But still, some bright sparks on the ’Squad took it upon themselves, in the 2002 ISDA, to switch out reference to “{{{{{1}}}|Affiliate}}s” which — I don’t know, might take in some distant half-bred cousin you don’t enormously care about and who doesn’t cast any real shadow on your creditworthiness or something? — with {{{{{1}}}|Credit Support Provider}}s and {{{{{1}}}|Specified Entities}} who no doubt more keenly do, but this leads to just more fiddliness in the Schedule over-stuffed with fiddliness, since one must then go to the trouble of specifying, and then arguing with your counterparties about, who should count as a {{{{{1}}}|Specified Entity}} for this remote and rather vacuous purpose.

Keeps the home fires burning in the hobbity shires where ISDA negotiators make their homes, we suppose.