Collateralised emissions obligations: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "{{a|myth|{{fwmd|Emissions allowance|}}}}Collateralised Emissions Obligation, an apocryphal transaction type that did not, but had it existed, surely would have, precipitat..."
 
No edit summary
 
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|myth|{{fwmd|Emissions allowance|}}}}[[Collateralised Emissions Obligation]], an apocryphal transaction type that did not, but had it existed, surely would have, precipitated a global financial crisis, as [[Carbon trading|carbon traders]], hopped-up on absurd amounts of [[synthetic alpha]] blew up not just the financial markets but the entgire ecosystem with their leveraged bets on greenhouse gas regulations.
{{a|myth|{{fwmd|Emissions allowance|}}}}[[Collateralised emissions obligations]], (also known as “'''[[CEmO]]s'''”) were an apocryphal structured product type consisting of a tranched, securitised, leveraged exposure to carbon credits<ref>In the heady days of 2007 the [[JC]] even had this idea, ran down to the commodities trading floor to share what he thought was a tremendous joke with the structured products team. The lead structurer shook his head morosely and said, “Won’t work. We have tried and we can’t get the accounting treatment we need.”</ref> that did not in fact exist but, had it existed, surely would have precipitated a [[global financial crisis]], as [[Carbon trading|carbon traders]], hopped-up on absurd amounts of [[synthetic alpha]] blew up not just the financial markets but the entire planetary ecosystem with their leveraged bets on the squirrely commitments of G20 nations to act on climate change.
 
“A five-times leveraged derivative of hot air!” traders would chortle, selling these things out to the most vulnerable and credulous people in society: minimum-wage hospitality workers, the elderly, the infirm, the illiterate and regional German ''landesbanks''.
 
{{sa}}
*[[Carbon trading]]
*[[Emissions Annex Anatomy]]
*[[Global financial crisis]]
{{ref}}

Latest revision as of 13:05, 29 July 2022

Myths and legends of the market
The JC’s guide to the foundational mythology of the markets.™
Top Trumps®
Financial Weapons of Mass Destruction®



Emissions Allowance

Wanna stop frying the planet? Start here. Will it help? Who knows? The forward curve is in contango: who cares!

Docs Take your pick: IETA, ISDA or even EFET: none of them good. But at least you have flexibility in mediocrity 4
Amendability Nope. The EU can amend them, but you can’t. 0
Collateral They aren’t anyone’s obligations as such. In fact, they’re more like a sort of unofficial, made up, (hush) crypto. No credit risk! DNA
Transferability With an account at the Union Registry, sure! 7
Leverage Not unless you do a CEmO, and we just made that up. 0
Fright-o-meter Not directly scary as long as there is an EU with Greta Thundberg in it, but global warming is going to lead to Armageddon so, you know, indirectly. 5

Index: Click to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

Collateralised emissions obligations, (also known as “CEmOs”) were an apocryphal structured product type consisting of a tranched, securitised, leveraged exposure to carbon credits[1] that did not in fact exist but, had it existed, surely would have precipitated a global financial crisis, as carbon traders, hopped-up on absurd amounts of synthetic alpha blew up not just the financial markets but the entire planetary ecosystem with their leveraged bets on the squirrely commitments of G20 nations to act on climate change.

“A five-times leveraged derivative of hot air!” traders would chortle, selling these things out to the most vulnerable and credulous people in society: minimum-wage hospitality workers, the elderly, the infirm, the illiterate and regional German landesbanks.

See also

References

  1. In the heady days of 2007 the JC even had this idea, ran down to the commodities trading floor to share what he thought was a tremendous joke with the structured products team. The lead structurer shook his head morosely and said, “Won’t work. We have tried and we can’t get the accounting treatment we need.”