Template:M summ 2002 ISDA 5(b)(iv): Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "A “{{isdaprov|Burdened Party}}” is different from an “{{isdaprov|Affected Party}}” because taxes may be imposed on one’s ''income'' (in which case one is both “bur...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
A “{{isdaprov|Burdened Party}}” is different from an “{{isdaprov|Affected Party}}” because taxes may be imposed on one’s ''income'' (in which case one is both “burdened” by the {{isdaprov|Tax}}, in that you are the one that has to pay it, and “affected” by it, in the sense that your income is correspondingly reduced as a result) or on one’s payment obligations to someone else (in which case one is “burdened” by the tax, but not “affected” by it, since it is your poor payee who winds up a bit short in the proverbial ring).
A “{{isdaprov|Burdened Party}}” is different from an “{{isdaprov|Affected Party}}” because taxes may fall on one’s ''own income'' (in which case one is both “''burdened''”, since you are the one who has to stump up to the taxman, and “''affected''” since your own income is correspondingly reduced by the payment) or on one’s ''payment obligations to someone else'' (in which case one is “''burdened''” by the tax, but not “''affected''” by it, since it is your poor counterparty who winds up a bit short in the proverbial ring).

Revision as of 17:55, 13 September 2022

A “Burdened Party” is different from an “Affected Party” because taxes may fall on one’s own income (in which case one is both “burdened”, since you are the one who has to stump up to the taxman, and “affected” since your own income is correspondingly reduced by the payment) or on one’s payment obligations to someone else (in which case one is “burdened” by the tax, but not “affected” by it, since it is your poor counterparty who winds up a bit short in the proverbial ring).