Template:Causal intervention and symbolic language: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Living things — biological organisms, but also cellular automata etc) necessarily have encoded into them a set of “instructions” for their own rep...") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Hamlet’s phrase: “[[There’s the rub|The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune]]” has less physical energy content — at the limit, less total ''information'' content — than the four paragraphs that precede it. | Hamlet’s phrase: “[[There’s the rub|The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune]]” has less physical energy content — at the limit, less total ''information'' content — than the four paragraphs that precede it. | ||
But it doesn’t, does it? Those seven words are far richer, more meaningful, and culturally significant than the entire output of this wiki: at last count, {{NUMBEROFARTICLES}} articles containing tens of thousands of lines of pompous, deluded text.<ref>Oh but [[paradox]]: This wiki contains — ''twice'' — the expression “The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune” — ''three times!'' — | But it doesn’t, does it? Those seven words are far richer, more meaningful, and culturally significant than the entire output of this wiki: at last count, {{NUMBEROFARTICLES}} articles containing tens of thousands of lines of pompous, deluded text.<ref>Oh but [[paradox]]: This wiki contains — ''twice'' — the expression “The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune” — ''three times now!'' — so does that mean it has falsified itself? We think not. Because — ''context''.</ref> | ||
Any research program that stops there — as materialism does — has missed a pretty big part of the picture. | Any research program that stops there — as materialism does — has missed a pretty big part of the picture. | ||
Revision as of 09:59, 15 November 2022
Living things — biological organisms, but also cellular automata etc) necessarily have encoded into them a set of “instructions” for their own replication: this is an operating condition for being a replicator: the organism functions a bit like a Turing machine. The physical substrate in which the substrate is encoded is not important tot he replication process in a material sense, only in a symbolic one. The instructions themselves are “substrate neutral”: could be encoded in DNA, cells, ticker tape or code.
Now, philosophy nuts: recall from your God, Mind and Free Will intro lectures the materialist “clincher” that proved consciousness must be wholly material: there is no evidence for non-material causal interventions in the physical world. If there were, there would be some kind of injection or leakage of energy into the physical system. But there is not: energy is conserved. A non-material consciousness to would invalidate the laws of thermodynamics: non-material consciousness breaks rules of thermodynamics, in other words. Game over.
But, hold on: this is, as Daniel Dennett articulates it, {br|Darwin’s Dangerous Idea}}. Evolution is an algorithmic process. It is, in its most abstract sense, a manipulation of symbolic logic. And isn’t this *exactly* what a symbolic language does? It operates on a figurative level: it injects meaning independent of the substrate in which it is articulated, without the need for any physical causal intervention? Thermodynamics are irrelevant.
If you analyse a Turing machine in purely thermodynamic terms (the transfer of energy inside a physical brain, or across a CPU) you are missing almost everything important about the machine.
The heat energy of a sentence is not what is meaningful about it.
Hamlet’s phrase: “The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune” has less physical energy content — at the limit, less total information content — than the four paragraphs that precede it.
But it doesn’t, does it? Those seven words are far richer, more meaningful, and culturally significant than the entire output of this wiki: at last count, 4,561 articles containing tens of thousands of lines of pompous, deluded text.[1]
Any research program that stops there — as materialism does — has missed a pretty big part of the picture.