Template:M summ Digital Assets All: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Now do I want to be “that guy” — obviously yes, I do — and point out that if {{icds}} has restricted itself to jus...")
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
[[2023 ISDA Digital Asset Transactions Definitions|Now]] do I want to be “that guy” — obviously yes, I do — and point out that if {{icds}} has restricted itself to just [[bitcoin]] and [[ethereum]], which apparently it has, both of which are [[Cryptocurrency|crypto''currencies'']] not [[Crypto asset|crypto ''assets'']] as such then these nascent definitions booklets are really rather misnamed.
[[2023 ISDA Digital Asset Transactions Definitions|Now]] do I want to be “that guy” — obviously yes, I do — and point out that if {{icds}} has restricted itself to just [[bitcoin]] and [[ethereum]] which apparently it has — and both of which are [[Cryptocurrency|crypto''currencies'']]” and not [[Crypto asset|crypto ''assets'']]as such, then the sad fact of the matter is that this nascent definitions booklet is really rather badly mis''named''.


We refer keen readers to the JC’s many impassioned treatises on the nature of cash. [[Cash]] is not, in the twilight, purblind world the [[JC]] inhabits, “[[property]]”  at all in the sense it can be held, but not owned; she who holds it can therefore utter it free of any competing claim in the world. But rather a token of value that leaves behind it only [[indebtedness]].
We refer keen readers to the [[JC]]’s many impassioned treatises on the nature of [[cash]] ''[[money]]''. [[Cash]] is not, in the twilight, purblind world the [[JC]] inhabits, “[[property]]”  at all in the sense it can be held, but not owned; she who holds it can therefore utter it free of any competing claim in the world. But rather a token of value that leaves behind it only [[indebtedness]].


“[[Asset]]s” are not like that.
“[[Asset]]s” are not like that.

Latest revision as of 18:40, 9 January 2023

Now do I want to be “that guy” — obviously yes, I do — and point out that if ISDA’s crack drafting squad™ has restricted itself to just bitcoin and ethereum — which apparently it has — and both of which are “cryptocurrencies” and not “crypto assets” as such, then the sad fact of the matter is that this nascent definitions booklet is really rather badly misnamed.

We refer keen readers to the JC’s many impassioned treatises on the nature of cash money. Cash is not, in the twilight, purblind world the JC inhabits, “property” at all in the sense it can be held, but not owned; she who holds it can therefore utter it free of any competing claim in the world. But rather a token of value that leaves behind it only indebtedness.

Assets” are not like that.