Template:M comp disc 2016 CSA 2(b): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "The only differences here are the liberal spraying of “(VM)” all over the shop. If anyone knows why {{icds}} elected to do that, do write in at let us know.") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The only differences here are the liberal spraying of “(VM)” all over the shop | The only differences here are the liberal, but all the same redundant, spraying of “(VM)” all over the shop in the 2016, a single reference to the {{vmcsaprov|Regular Settlement Day}} in place of non-Regular — that is to say, ''regular'' — {{csaprov|Settlement Day}} (which goes pretty much without saying anyway, per our nutshell version) and the fact that the balance is deducted from the {{csaprov|Credit Support Balance}} in the 1995, but the {{vmcsaprov|Transferee}}’s {{vmcsaprov|Exposure}} in the 2016 (there not ''being'' a concept of a {{csaprov|Credit Support Amount}} in the 2016), for reasons which are explored more fully below). | ||
Latest revision as of 14:59, 22 February 2023
The only differences here are the liberal, but all the same redundant, spraying of “(VM)” all over the shop in the 2016, a single reference to the Regular Settlement Day in place of non-Regular — that is to say, regular — Settlement Day (which goes pretty much without saying anyway, per our nutshell version) and the fact that the balance is deducted from the Credit Support Balance in the 1995, but the Transferee’s Exposure in the 2016 (there not being a concept of a Credit Support Amount in the 2016), for reasons which are explored more fully below).