Template:M comp disc Credit Derivatives 4.5: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "The obvious comparison is with Section {{isdaprov|5(a)(i)}} of the {{isdama}}." Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The obvious comparison is with Section {{isdaprov|5(a)(i)}} of the {{isdama}}. | [[4.5 - Credit Derivatives Provision|The]] obvious comparison is with Section {{isdaprov|5(a)(i)}} of the {{isdama}}, though a closer practical analogue is {{isdaprov|Cross Default}}. See also Potentioal Failure to Pay, which you might like to think would be the next provision, after {{cddprov|Failure to Pay}}, or maybe the previous one, or at least with the other {{cddprov|Credit Events}} in Article {{cddprov|4}}, but no, it its boundless wisdom {{icds}} saw fit to bury it at Article {{cddprov|1.48}}. It’s fun, though. It makes the {{cdd}} more like a treasure hunt. | ||
Latest revision as of 09:40, 25 April 2023
The obvious comparison is with Section 5(a)(i) of the ISDA Master Agreement, though a closer practical analogue is Cross Default. See also Potentioal Failure to Pay, which you might like to think would be the next provision, after Failure to Pay, or maybe the previous one, or at least with the other Credit Events in Article 4, but no, it its boundless wisdom ISDA’s crack drafting squad™ saw fit to bury it at Article 1.48. It’s fun, though. It makes the 2014 ISDA Credit Derivatives Definitions more like a treasure hunt.