Template:M comp disc EUA Annex (d)(i): Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
=== {{euaprov|Delivery}} === | === {{euaprov|Delivery}} === | ||
{{M comp disc EUA Annex (d)(i)(2)}} | {{M comp disc EUA Annex (d)(i)(2)}} | ||
=== {{euaprov|Netting}} === | <noinclude>=== {{euaprov|Netting}} === | ||
{{M comp disc EUA Annex (d)(i)(3)}} | {{M comp disc EUA Annex (d)(i)(3)}}</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 17:20, 19 May 2023
Settlement
The same broad concept is dealt with as follows:
- ISDA: Settlement
- EFET: Delivery, Acceptance and Scheduling Obligations
- IETA: Primary Obligation
Situation normal... : Techy drafting slip from ISDA’s crack drafting squad™: “Number of Allowances to be Delivered” isn’t a thing: there is “Number of Allowances”, which is the notional size of the Transaction, and then there is Allowances to be Delivered which references the particular number of Allowances to be settled under an Option and thus already builds in a number.
Delivery
What counts as a delivery, when it is deemed completed, to which accounts and so on, and some curious over-description redolent of a bad used car salesman who really should have stopped talking, but found himself filling the uncomfortable silence with words which by their pregnancy compel him to complete his sentence, which in turn, he realises to his horror, compels him to confess mechanical flaws in the lemon he was really hoping you would drive off the lot with before discovering.