Template:Csacapsule 1(b): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "'''{{vmcsaprov|Covered Transaction}} ''': As a concept, “{{vmcsaprov|Covered Transaction}}” only arrived in the {{vmcsa}}. Under the {{csa}}, the neatest way of describing..." |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''{{vmcsaprov|Covered Transaction}} ''': As a concept, “{{vmcsaprov|Covered Transaction}}” only arrived in the {{vmcsa}}. Under the {{csa}}, the neatest way of describing whether a given set of {{isdaprov|Transaction}}s | '''{{vmcsaprov|Covered Transaction}}''': As a concept, “{{vmcsaprov|Covered Transaction}}” only arrived in the {{vmcsa}}, in Paragraph {{vmcsaprov|1(b)}}. | ||
Under the {{csa}}, the neatest way of describing whether a given set of {{isdaprov|Transaction}}s is covered or not is to say something like: | |||
“[SPECIFY] Transactions will [not] be relevant for purposes of determining “[[Exposure - CSA Provision|Exposure]]” under the {{csa}}.” | {{quote| | ||
“[SPECIFY] Transactions will [not] be relevant for purposes of determining “[[Exposure - CSA Provision|Exposure]]” under the {{csa}}.”}} | |||
Latest revision as of 13:27, 25 May 2023
Covered Transaction: As a concept, “Covered Transaction” only arrived in the 2016 VM CSA, in Paragraph 1(b).
Under the 1995 CSA, the neatest way of describing whether a given set of Transactions is covered or not is to say something like:
“[SPECIFY] Transactions will [not] be relevant for purposes of determining “Exposure” under the 1995 CSA.”