Template:Rep no violation: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:39, 12 January 2020 view source Amwelladmin (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators 88,419 edits Created page with "No, it doesn't make any sense to add this agreement, nor to have a separate continuing warranty that you have not breached this agreement. That is t..."		Latest revision as of 08:48, 29 May 2023 view source Amwelladmin (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators 88,419 edits Blanked the page Tag: Blanking
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
	No, it doesn't make any sense to add this agreement, nor to have a separate continuing [[warranty]] that you have not [[Breach of contract\|breached this agreement]]. That is tantamount to a {{repprov\|no event of default}} rep — so you should already have it — and as canvassed in that very article, that [[representation]] is, in any case, a big old waste of time. If I ''tell'' you I have not breached the agreement, but in actual fact, I ''have'', in what way are you in a better position than if I ''didn't'' tell you that? <br>

Latest revision as of 08:48, 29 May 2023