Template:M premium summary repack Bills of Exchange Act 1882: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "The ontological existence of debt in a negotiable instrument, and how it differs as between a promissory note and a bill of exchange") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The [[Ontology|ontological]] existence of debt in a [[negotiable instrument]], and how it differs as between a [[promissory note]] and a [[bill of exchange]] | *Are [[bearer bond|bearer bonds]] sufficiently unconditional to qualify as [[promissory note]]s under the Bills of Exchange Act? A Canadian court in the 1950s thought not, but we think that court was, in the main, wrong. | ||
*The [[Ontology|ontological]] existence of debt in a [[negotiable instrument]], and how it differs as between a [[promissory note]] and a [[bill of exchange]] | |||
Latest revision as of 08:14, 19 June 2023
- Are bearer bonds sufficiently unconditional to qualify as promissory notes under the Bills of Exchange Act? A Canadian court in the 1950s thought not, but we think that court was, in the main, wrong.
- The ontological existence of debt in a negotiable instrument, and how it differs as between a promissory note and a bill of exchange