Non-affected Party - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Tag: New redirect
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{fullanat2|isda|Non-affected Party|2002|Non-affected Party|1992}}
#redirect[[Affected Party - ISDA Provision]]
A clause so joyously well-crafted in 1992, that the ISDA boxwallahs saw no need to change it a decade later, when the opportunity presented itself. They might have grasped it to devise a concept less clumsy than “the {{isdaprov|Non-affected Party}} or the {{isdaprov|Non-defaulting Party}}, as the case may be”, but that’s just me.
 
 
{{Seealso}}
*{{isdaprov|Affected Party}}
*{{isdaprov|Defaulting Party}}
*{{isdaprov|Non-defaulting Party}}

Latest revision as of 09:33, 23 June 2023