Template:First law of worker entropy: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
:(ii) As the  number of scheduled participants increases, that probability tends to zero.  
:(ii) As the  number of scheduled participants increases, that probability tends to zero.  
:(iii) The more participants there are the more retarded the starting time (and content) of the meeting will be. <br>
:(iii) The more participants there are the more retarded the starting time (and content) of the meeting will be. <br>
This is true of any meeting containing more than one person. (A single-person meeting, of course, ought not, in a sensible mind, count, at least since {{otto}} asserted through his maxim “[[occursum ergo es]]” that, to be meaningful, a meeting must have more than one, but fewer than two, people.)
This is true of any meeting containing more than one person. (A single-person meeting, of course, ought not, in a sensible mind, count, at least since {{otto}} asserted its incoherence through his maxim “[[convenimus ergo es]]”).<br>
 
As a consequence of these axioms there is thus a lower ''and'' an upper bound on the number of people possible in a viable meeting of a given duration. <br>

Latest revision as of 13:34, 2 September 2023

The JC’s first law of worker entropy (also known as the “meeting paradox”):

(i) The probability of a meeting starting on time can never be 100%;
(ii) As the number of scheduled participants increases, that probability tends to zero.
(iii) The more participants there are the more retarded the starting time (and content) of the meeting will be.

This is true of any meeting containing more than one person. (A single-person meeting, of course, ought not, in a sensible mind, count, at least since Otto Büchstein asserted its incoherence through his maxim “convenimus ergo es”).

Retrieved from "https://jollycontrarian.com/index.php?title=Template:First_law_of_worker_entropy&oldid=77855"