82,903
edits
Template:M intro design process: Difference between revisions
Template:M intro design process (view source)
Revision as of 19:57, 7 September 2023
, 7 September 2023no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Integrity of the process is ''everything'' in modern risk management {{t|dogma}}. Hence [[risk taxonomies]], [[service catalog]]s and [[playbook]]s. | [[Process|Integrity]] of the process is ''everything'' in modern risk management {{t|dogma}}. Hence [[risk taxonomies]], [[service catalog]]s and [[playbook]]s. | ||
Following an [[algorithm]] requires no comprehension of the ''content'' of the [[process]] — you don’t need to know how an internal combustion engine works to drive a car — and comprehension even risks ''subversion'' of the process: if [[subject matter expert]]ise might incline one to ''take a view'' on process step, such that the form breaks, even though the substance does not, and if your means of control is predicated on the immaculate operation of process, there is something to be said for ''removing'' [[subject matter expert]]s from the process altogether, and staffing it with those with ''no'' insight, who will be inclined to be as machine-like as can be. The process is its overlord. | Following an [[algorithm]] requires no comprehension of the ''content'' of the [[process]] — you don’t need to know how an internal combustion engine works to drive a car — and comprehension even risks ''subversion'' of the process: if [[subject matter expert]]ise might incline one to ''take a view'' on process step, such that the form breaks, even though the substance does not, and if your means of control is predicated on the immaculate operation of process, there is something to be said for ''removing'' [[subject matter expert]]s from the process altogether, and staffing it with those with ''no'' insight, who will be inclined to be as machine-like as can be. The process is its overlord. | ||