Enforcing security: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{a|repack|}}Commercial legal eagles know a lot about ''taking'' security and ''granting'' security, but are usually well-clear of the blast radius by the time it comes to ''enforcing'' security. They will talk airily of enforcing security without necessarily having a good practical grasp of what it means. Your first port of call should be the Law of Property Act 1925. One can take possession of the secured property, or appoint a receiver or administrator.") |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 09:15, 19 September 2023
|
The Law and Lore of Repackaging
|
Commercial legal eagles know a lot about taking security and granting security, but are usually well-clear of the blast radius by the time it comes to enforcing security. They will talk airily of enforcing security without necessarily having a good practical grasp of what it means.
Your first port of call should be the Law of Property Act 1925. One can take possession of the secured property, or appoint a receiver or administrator.