Deduction or withholding: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a| | {{a|plainenglish|}}{{withholding and deduction pedantry}} | ||
{{Sa}} | {{Sa}} | ||
*{{gmslaprov|Withholding, gross up and provision of information}} under the {{gmsla}} | *{{gmslaprov|Withholding, gross up and provision of information}} under the {{gmsla}} | ||
*{{isdaprov|Deduction or | *{{isdaprov|Deduction or Withholding for Tax}} under the {{isda}} | ||
{{Ref}} | |||
Latest revision as of 15:00, 22 September 2023
|
Towards more picturesque speech™
|
Happy news, readers: we have a report from the front lines in the battle between substance and form. The JC asked no lesser a tax ninja than Dan Neidle — quietly, the JC is a bit of a fan — the following question:
In the statement, “X may make a deduction or withholding from any payment for or on account of any tax” is there any difference between “deducting” and “withholding”?
They seem to be exact synonyms.
Likewise, “for” vs. “on account of”?
We are pleased to report Mr N opined[1] replied:
I don’t think there’s a difference. Arguably it’s done for clarity, because people normally say “withholding tax” but technically there’s no such thing — it’s a deduction of income tax.
Which is good enough for me. So all of that “shall be entitled to make a deduction or withholding from any payment which it makes pursuant to this agreement for or on account of any Tax” can be scattered to the four winds. Henceforth the JC is going with:
X may deduct Tax from any payment it makes under this Agreement.
See also
- Withholding, gross up and provision of information under the 2010 GMSLA
- Deduction or Withholding for Tax under the ISDA