Who says: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
{{quote|“Who says port is just for Christmas?”<ref>https://x.com/BarricaWines/status/1677584610430013440?</ref>}} | {{quote|“Who says port is just for Christmas?”<ref>https://x.com/BarricaWines/status/1677584610430013440?</ref>}} | ||
To which the only answer is, “''YOU'' JUST DID, YOU IDIOT.” | To which the only answer is, “''YOU'' JUST DID, YOU IDIOT.” | ||
The message you are trying to convey is ''anything but that''. You had unlimited choice in your campaign strategy: why on Earth dwell defensively on that poor perception? | |||
Now the JC doesn’t know — ''waaaay'' to sexy for that — but he supposes that, when it comes to port and stilton, the world divides into three major groups: | |||
#Non-consumers who ''do'' believe it to be unsexy/only for Christmas [[and/or]] crusty old men. | |||
#Non-consumers who do ''not'' believe it to be " " ". | |||
#Present consumers, regardless of how sexy, when or for whom they believe it, or themselves to be. | |||
Now consider how this question might go over with those three classes: | |||
# Non-consumers ''already of that opinion'' will need to hear something more compelling than, “you’re wrong, you know.” | # Non-consumers ''already of that opinion'' will need to hear something more compelling than, “you’re wrong, you know.” | ||
# Non-consumers who do ''not'' believe that — there must be some — the ''last'' thing you want to admit is | # To Non-consumers who do ''not'' believe that — there must be some — the ''last'' thing you want to admit is that this might be any kind of consensus, however misconceived, that might lead them to think, “oh, so hang on: do people think port and stilton is only for crusty old men? At Christmas? I didn’t realise that. Ew.” | ||
# Current customers | # Current customers, being people we know ''do'' like port and stilton. Regardless of their comeliness, crustiness or drinking schedule, the odds are these people will be either crusty old men who are in denial, or at least regretful, about it and wishful things were otherwise. It is no more edifying for those young and sexy port drinkers who are not: they will find affront at the allegation that they are. Either way, they will think: “I had better not drink port or eat stilton any more, because people will think I am a a sexless, crusty old bugger who only comes out at Christmas if I do.” | ||
No-one likes crusty, sexless old buggers who only come out at Christmas. Except kids, and they don’t usually like stilton and won’t be allowed port, even though they would probably love it. | No-one likes crusty, sexless old buggers who only come out at Christmas. Except kids, and they don’t usually like stilton and won’t be allowed port, even though they would probably love it. | ||
Latest revision as of 16:31, 27 September 2023
|
The design of organisations and products
|
If the premise of advertising is to distract an audience’s attention from a product’s perceived shortcomings, and not to draw attention to them, any advertisement that starts with the rhetorical, “who says...” is getting things profoundly wrong.
Cheese, port, and crusty old buggers
The classic case was a poster spotted on the tube a few years ago, from the Blue Cheese Marketing Board — it may have the Fortified Wines Collective come to think of it, or the Cheap Plonk and Stinky Dairy Joint Association — along these lines:
“Who says port and stilton are just for old men?”
More recently, an Australasian purveyor Niepoort asked,
“Who says port isn’t sexy?”[1]
Or even, on X:
“Who says port is just for Christmas?”[2]
To which the only answer is, “YOU JUST DID, YOU IDIOT.”
The message you are trying to convey is anything but that. You had unlimited choice in your campaign strategy: why on Earth dwell defensively on that poor perception?
Now the JC doesn’t know — waaaay to sexy for that — but he supposes that, when it comes to port and stilton, the world divides into three major groups:
- Non-consumers who do believe it to be unsexy/only for Christmas and/or crusty old men.
- Non-consumers who do not believe it to be " " ".
- Present consumers, regardless of how sexy, when or for whom they believe it, or themselves to be.
Now consider how this question might go over with those three classes:
- Non-consumers already of that opinion will need to hear something more compelling than, “you’re wrong, you know.”
- To Non-consumers who do not believe that — there must be some — the last thing you want to admit is that this might be any kind of consensus, however misconceived, that might lead them to think, “oh, so hang on: do people think port and stilton is only for crusty old men? At Christmas? I didn’t realise that. Ew.”
- Current customers, being people we know do like port and stilton. Regardless of their comeliness, crustiness or drinking schedule, the odds are these people will be either crusty old men who are in denial, or at least regretful, about it and wishful things were otherwise. It is no more edifying for those young and sexy port drinkers who are not: they will find affront at the allegation that they are. Either way, they will think: “I had better not drink port or eat stilton any more, because people will think I am a a sexless, crusty old bugger who only comes out at Christmas if I do.”
No-one likes crusty, sexless old buggers who only come out at Christmas. Except kids, and they don’t usually like stilton and won’t be allowed port, even though they would probably love it.
Recent examples
Ariya: This advertisement for Nissan’s ARIYA electric crossover asks:
“Who said electricity can’t excite us any more?”
The JC was like, “What? Well, YOU just did, for one thing, and for another, no-one else ever did. ‘Electric’ is literally a synonym for “exciting”.