Template:M summ 2002 ISDA 4: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
Replaced content with "{{isda 4 summ|isdaprov}}"
Tag: Replaced
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
A hodge-podge of “state the bleeding obvious” rules, breach of some of which justifies (eventual) close-out as a “breach of agreement” — flagrantly breaking the law, carelessly losing one’s regulatory authorisations — and random tax provisions and indemnities, which by and large ''don’t'' justify close-out.
{{isda 4 summ|isdaprov}}
 
'''Section {{isdaprov|4(a)}}''': {{specified information capsule|isdaprov}}
 
'''Section {{isdaprov|4(b)}}''': {{isda 4(b) summ|isdaprov}}
 
'''Section {{isdaprov|4(e)}}''': Basically, if there is any {{isdaprov|Stamp Tax}} imposed because of my existence or residence in a certain jurisdiction, whether imposed on me or you, I’ll pay it, unless it would have been imposed on you too. If we’re both in the same {{isdaprov|Stamp Tax Jurisdiction}}, the liability lies where it falls.

Latest revision as of 16:57, 13 October 2023

A hodge-podge of “state the bleeding obvious” rules, breach of some of which justifies (eventual) close-out as a “breach of agreement” — agreeing to provide the credit information you have patiently listed in your schedule, flagrantly breaking the law, carelessly losing one’s regulatory authorisations — and random tax provisions and indemnities (providing the necessary tax forms to minimise tax, and pay tax if you don’t).

These are the dull agreements — which by and large don’t justify close-out.

Retrieved from "https://jollycontrarian.com/index.php?title=Template:M_summ_2002_ISDA_4&oldid=79071"