Template:Emissions EEP overview: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{emissions same comp|Excess Emissions Penalty}}
{{emissions same comp|Excess Emissions Penalty}}
Seeing as it is quite a fundamental part of the economic risk of {{{{{1}}}|Allowance}} trading, we should not be surprised to find that all three versions have a concept of {{{{{1}}}|EEP}} or {{{{{1}}}|Emissions Excess Penalty}}, nor that, per their Myers-Briggs personality types, ISDA has gone for quite unnecessary optionality, IETA has sort of followed suit, and EFET has gone for none, but laborious drafting of alternatives anyway. Hey ho.
Seeing as it is quite a fundamental part of the economic risk of {{{{{1}}}|Allowance}} trading, we should not be surprised to find that all three versions have a concept of {{{{{1}}}|EEP}} or {{{{{1}}}|Excess Emissions Penalty}}, nor that, per their Myers-Briggs personality types, ISDA has gone for quite unnecessary optionality, IETA has sort of followed suit, and EFET has gone for none, but laborious drafting of alternatives anyway. Hey ho.

Latest revision as of 14:26, 17 October 2023

The definition of Excess Emissions Penalty is more or less the same in all three emissions trading documentation regimes. Compare:
ISDA: Excess Emissions Penalty
IETA: Excess Emissions Penalty
EFET: Excess Emissions Penalty
Seeing as it is quite a fundamental part of the economic risk of {{{{{1}}}|Allowance}} trading, we should not be surprised to find that all three versions have a concept of {{{{{1}}}|EEP}} or {{{{{1}}}|Excess Emissions Penalty}}, nor that, per their Myers-Briggs personality types, ISDA has gone for quite unnecessary optionality, IETA has sort of followed suit, and EFET has gone for none, but laborious drafting of alternatives anyway. Hey ho.