Template:Isda 2 comp: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Readers looking for significant differences between the {{1992ma}} and {{2002ma}} will find their socks resolutely still on by the time they get to the end of section {{isdaprov|2}}. Other than some new {{isdaprov|Multiple Transaction Payment Netting}} wording designed to untangle a cat’s cradle of language that, in this commentator opinion, didn’t need to be there in the first place, the only significant change in Section {{isdaprov|2}} is that the {{isda92prov|Default Interest}} provision has been removed and now appears, in a gruesomely reorganised format, in Section {{isdaprov|9(h)}} of the {{2002ma}}.
Readers looking for significant differences between the {{1992ma}} and {{2002ma}} will find their socks resolutely still on by the time they get to the end of section {{isdaprov|2}}. Other than some new {{isdaprov|Multiple Transaction Payment Netting}} wording designed to untangle a cat’s cradle of language that, in this commentator opinion, didn’t need to be there in the first place, the only significant change in Section {{isdaprov|2}} is that the {{isda92prov|Default Interest}} provision has been removed and now appears, in a gruesomely reorganised format, in Section {{isdaprov|9(h)}} of the {{2002ma}}.
{{comp part {{{1}}}|2(a)}}
{{comp part {{{1}}}|2(a)}}
=====Section 2(a)=====
{{comp part {{{1}}}|2(b)}}
{{M comp disc 2002 ISDA 2(a)}}
{{comp part {{{1}}}|2(c)}}
=====Section 2(b)=====
{{comp part {{{1}}}|2(d)}}
{{M comp disc 2002 ISDA 2(b)}}
=====Section 2(c) =====
{{M comp disc 2002 ISDA 2(c)}}
=====Section 2(d)=====
{{M comp disc 2002 ISDA 2(d)}}

Revision as of 17:42, 23 December 2023

Readers looking for significant differences between the 1992 ISDA and 2002 ISDA will find their socks resolutely still on by the time they get to the end of section 2. Other than some new Multiple Transaction Payment Netting wording designed to untangle a cat’s cradle of language that, in this commentator opinion, didn’t need to be there in the first place, the only significant change in Section 2 is that the Default Interest provision has been removed and now appears, in a gruesomely reorganised format, in Section 9(h) of the 2002 ISDA. {{comp part {{{1}}}|2(a)}} {{comp part {{{1}}}|2(b)}} {{comp part {{{1}}}|2(c)}} {{comp part {{{1}}}|2(d)}}