Template:M comp disc 2002 ISDA 2(a)(iii): Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(Replaced content with "{{isda 2(a)(iii) comp|isdaprov}}")
Tag: Replaced
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Section {{isdaprov|2(a)(iii)}} is the world-famous, notorious, much-feared [[flawed asset]] provision in the {{isdama}}. Fertile hunting grounds for fee-hungry barristers in the [[Re Lehman Brothers International - Case Note|Re Lehman Brothers International]] and [[Re Spectrum Plus - Case Note|Re Spectrum Plus]] litigations.
{{isda 2(a)(iii) comp|isdaprov}}

Latest revision as of 11:17, 30 December 2023

Section 2(a)(iii) is the world-famous, notorious, much-feared “flawed asset” provision in the ISDA Master Agreement. The text was mostly unchanged between the 1992 ISDA and the 2002 ISDA, bar a single clarification in Section 2(a)(iii)(3). There was a change from the 1987 ISDA which did not have the middle condition precedent that “no Early Termination Date in respect of the relevant Transaction has occurred or been effectively designated”. As to what all this means, or achieved, we speculate below.

Retrieved from "https://jollycontrarian.com/index.php?title=Template:M_comp_disc_2002_ISDA_2(a)(iii)&oldid=81514"